|
AdamL
2:34 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
I mean he can predict whatever bullshit result he wants based on whatever flawed logic he chooses but when he claims "Liverpool look more of a threat away from home at the moment" you do have to wonder what sort of crack he is smoking. Their last away outing they lost 3-0 to Watford. Before that, they lost 2-0 at Newcastle. Their home form has been much better.
An utterly inexplicable comment.
|
Steve P
9:16 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
After losing at Anfield
'What happened at Anfield against West Ham on Saturday was a massive, massive shock.
The way Liverpool have been defending, looking really solid, I just didn’t see it coming, writes Lawro in his Liverpool Echo column.
Even when they scored the early goal, you think there’s lots of time to get back into the game.
But overall we did as many poor things yesterday as the collective good things we did in the opening three games.
West Ham are going to finish down towards the bottom of the league, they’re not a particularly good team.'
LOL - wanker sign
|
Private Dancer
9:18 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
Morning P.
Isn't the Lawro thing all a bit boring now?
|
Steve P
9:20 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
Maybe, Bleeding - although it's fair to say this bloke has been doing this for years, not just the last few seasons.
|
Mike Oxsaw
9:21 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
0-2?
...
0?
....
2?
...
Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag
Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag
Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag
Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag
Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag
Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag
Send out for more sides. Mine are fucked.
Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag Ag
|
Bom Stickle
1:32 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
Looking at this he looks like he is trying to claim he correctly predicted this weeks match as we have gone from a massive haul of 11 to 14 points. Cunt.
http://www.myfootballfacts.com/Mark_Lawrenson_Predictions_2015-16.html
|
Mad Dog
1:40 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
So he'd have us 2nd bottom?
What a know nothing cunt
|
eswing hammer
4:23 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
''Chelsea got done at home as well and overall some funny things have been happening in the league.''
''Nearly every team has had strange results''
This is exactly it ,the likes of Lawrenson ,Cundy etc cant get their heads around teams like Leicester ,Palace ourselves, upsetting their little status quo like they are used to, patting us on the
head telling us how well we tried whilst taking the six usual points !
|
Sxboy_66
4:47 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
eswing, it's not just those twats that apply that sort of logic though. The only surprising thing is that people keep paying them to do it.
There are plenty of people who think that certain teams have no right to beat other teams on no other basis than the name of the teams.
i.e. 'West Ham haven't won at Anfield for 52 years, therefore West Ham will not win that fixture'
Stats like that are utterly meaningless as the current West Ham squad, with it's current manager, had NEVER played at Anfield.
As stupid a measure of likely success or failure that is people still keep using it. People on here were soiling their dungarees when we lost to Leicester and Bournemouth earlier this season. They expected us to win because of the names of the opposition teams, with no regard to the players they had or the managers they had.
I believe this method to be the entire basis of Lawrenson's 'predictions'.
|
bruuuno
4:51 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
Exactly, he may as well just guess results based on lot preference. Total fucking mong
|
bruuuno
4:51 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
^kit
|
Hammer-ed
6:18 Sun Jan 3
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
That twat would probably say that the Liverpuss players had they mind on the League cup semi final, I bet he would use that as an excuse!
|
Eddie B
11:38 Mon Jan 4
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
The bloke deserves the cunting off he gets every week.
|
Bom Stickle
1:11 Mon Jan 4
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
Now back to 11 points. He's just the 7 wins away from being accurate.
http://www.myfootballfacts.com/Mark_Lawrenson_Predictions_2015-16.html
|
Lily Hammer
1:31 Mon Jan 4
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
Here's what he said in this week's Liverpool Echo, apparently we "bullied" their "more skillful" players into submission, with an apt photo to prove the point.....
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/mark-lawrenson-liverpool-fcs-shortcoming-10678449
If ever there was proof Liverpool's problem is as much one of mentality as ability, it came at Upton Park.
I can't recall a single team outclassing us this season.
I can, however, recall on far too many occasions when we have been outmuscled and bullied.
West Ham. Crystal Palace. West Bromwich Albion. Newcastle United. Watford.
And now dem nomarks West Ham again.
Jurgen Klopp was right to be upset his team only played at 90%. They aren't good enough to do that.
And on a day when you don't play particularly well, you have to dig in because we have the players who can win games, even if they aren't firing properly right now.
Instead, opposing teams know they just have to get stuck into Liverpool to get a result.
We just don't do da dirty work often enough, do we dough?
Look, I know we scrapped out a win at Sunderland last midweek, but that was as much down to Sunderland being desperately poor than anything else.
Beating Sunderland isn't a barometer for your season. But losing home and away to fooking West Ham certainly is.
Teams may not be as skilful as us but they are stronger. And nothing was done during the summer to address that fact despite it being patently obvious towards the tail end of last season.
Klopp will know this and, in the long term, will no doubt seek out players who are athletic, intelligent and strong enough to help implement his playing style.
It doesn't help that we are taking too many touches on the ball, a sure sign of a lack of confidence, so we need to come ed and calm down, calm down.
Against Manchester City earlier this season, we were good because we pressed hard, got the ball down and passed it around with the minimum of touches. It's direct football, but not necessarily using the long ball.
Much is rightly made of Christian Benteke's form, but if it wasn't for him we'd not have beaten Leicester and Sunderland.
He's a problem, but he's not the only one.
Just as guilty are the players behind him, who seem to want to play a killer pass inside the opening five minutes.
You can't really do that. You have to keep it and work the opposition at speed, and not just look for the incisive throughball at every opportunity.
Otherwise, you're forever giving the ball back to your opponents.
There's being direct and there's being clever. And Liverpool's players need to learn the difference.
|
eswing hammer
9:38 Mon Jan 4
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
''Beating Sunderland isn't a barometer for your season. But losing home and away to West Ham certainly is.''
Bitter cunt!
|
Eddie B
10:58 Tue Jan 5
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
Not only is he a cunt, he's also a fucking cunt.
|
Sniper
11:00 Tue Jan 5
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
So we beat them 3-0 away and 2-0 at home without outclassing them?
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
It's about time people started realising that Man U and Liverpool are where they are because they just aren't very good
|
BRANDED
11:04 Tue Jan 5
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
He's got a point. If they'd won the two games they'd be on 36 points and right in the mix. We'd be firmly mid table on 26 points.
|
Eddie B
11:10 Tue Jan 5
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
If my aunt had bollocks etc etc
|
Coffee
11:11 Tue Jan 5
Re: GTHC Predicts, no suprise and bang on form...
|
She'd be your uncle?
|
|
|
|
